There
are so many gross errors in the official transcript, I am forced to use very plain language correcting it. Not only is it worthless, but could do great harm to me. |
Criminal Appeal Office Ref. Nos. 2001/02818/Y3 & 2002/00269/Y3
Sheffield Crown
Court Ref. No. T20010001
From: Norman Scarth,
(for lifelong record & current address, see elsewhere)
Court address: 50, West Bar, SHEFFIELD S38 P4
Regina v Norman Scarth
(Transcript
by Margaret Wort & Co., Edial Farm, Edial, Burntwood, WALSALL WS7 0HZ.
Official Court
Reporters).
Page numbers (missing on original transcript) added by N.Scarth
Relevant paragraphs
are marked with * in margin of transcript.
Mr. A. HATTON
appeared on behalf of the prosecution. NORMAN SCARTH appeared in IN PERSON
(sic)
Page 2;
B. The cap was my White Beret worn by Russian Convoy Men. ‘inaudible’ should be, “a badge of honour at least as great
as your wig”. I was also wearing my WW II medals.
Page 4;
B. ‘Group (inaudible) Gratis’ should be ‘Ruth Bunday Practice’.
G; I had to correct Judge Judge Goldsack several times.
Page 5:
B; That official Appeal ‘Court Record’ also shows that
‘Mr. Barlow’ was sitting as ‘VICE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, CRIMINAL DIVISION’!!!
An absolute nonsense! How can
anyone believe anything
‘on the court record’ when it contains such nonsense! I have
a massive dossier of the same sort of gross incompetence going back six years. About
1998 I sent to Lords Woolf & Irvine a dossier of such emanating from Leeds Courthouse - including one Court Order with
about 14 mistakes on it. I sent a similar dossier in 2000. That of course, is why I am here – to prevent me publishing more!
Page 6:
C; ‘inaudible’ may have been ‘skulduggery’.
F; ‘inaudible’ should
be ‘Your impartiality is in question, much more than in
the Hoffman/Pinochet case’.
Page 7: C;
‘the Court of Appeal then heard your appeal against sentence’. COMPLETELY
UNTRUE! The Court of Appeal were determined NOT to hear or consider one single word of my grounds
for appeal - at least a score of cast iron points of law. They
were determined to hear ONLY
Barlow’s monstrous application. See para. E-F.
H; ‘inaudible’ should be ‘Dr. Barrington Barber’. ‘Ludgate’ should be ‘Dovegate’.
G; Judge. Goldsack,
“You will appreciate Mr. Scarth, that, at the moment, I can only go on the basis of the documents I have seen”. EXACTLY! He will not have seen ANY
document with anything to my credit! The
fact that the Appeal Court did not send the reports of Dr. Barrington Barber & Lesley Shackleton, indicates they were
determined Judge Goldsack would not have a single word in my favour before him! I HOPE HE IS AS DISTURBED ABOUT THAT AS I AM!
Page 8: A; ‘inaudible’ should
be ‘I have nothing to add, except to reiterate the point that
Mr. Norman Scarth is NOT suffering from any mental disorder’.
Page 12:
A; ‘Bellgate’ should be ‘Dovegate’.
G; ‘I can assure you I have read a great deal about that incident, but that is not what I am here to decide today’. Exactly: ‘that incident’, on 8th August 1999, will
never be investigated! It was an attempt on my life by no less than SEVEN police – ELEVEN MONTHS BEFORE the ‘crime’ I am supposed to have committed. There has been a nation-wide cover up of that police crime. Judge Goldsack continues that cover-up. What he SHOULD do is order an IMMEDIATE investigation into
that crime.
Page 14:
H; ‘he has fixed beliefs … which distress him’. The most damaging of Quinn’s monstrous lies. Far from being
‘distressed’, I count myself privileged to have been given the opportunity to challenge ‘fraud in the legal
system’ (as euphemistically described by Paul Boateng MP). Or such is my ‘delusion’. If so, then Cabinet Minister Boateng is equally deluded. ‘Conflict
with almost everyone he meets’? See the reports of Dr. Barrington Barber
& Lesley Shackleton, & TESTIMONIALS covering 60 years of my life from the age of 17.
Page 15:
A; It was June 2001 that Ness recommended I be in hospital rather than
prison. The much better communication here, & easy reach of supporters, would
have been much better for me
at that time. But no – for the most diabolical reasons they moved me further
& further away from home in a succession of ‘Hell Hole’ prisons.
D; ‘Care’? Mental torture, physical brutality, provocation
& oppression – he calls it ‘CARE’!!
E; Quinn & Curran are currently under official investigation by the General Medical Council ‘Fitness to Practice
Directorate’.
Page 16:
D; ‘THE ULTIMATE IS DEATH!’ What a brave man is Dr.
Quinn that he is prepared to risk death (mine – not his!) G-H; Restraint? The ‘Goose Neck’
for example. The Home Office says this ‘Approved Method of Restraint’
‘will cause pain & thus disable the patient’. I have experienced this ‘Home Office Approved Method’
in prison & Newton Lodge – each time on a trumped up excuse!
Page 19:
G; To his credit, at least Judge Goldsack stresses ‘IF’. Winning a case in the European Court of Human Rights & causing an important
change in British law to be incorporated into the 1998 Human Rights Act – doing so single-handed - suggests I am at least as capable as the
Official Solicitor!
Page 21:
G; The first ‘inaudible’ should be ‘veterinary surgeons’. 3rd
‘inaudible’ should be ‘I would not trust you with a white mouse’. 4th
‘inaudible’ should be ‘I wouldn’t trust you to dock piglets or puppy
dogs tails’. I did not say that to be offensive (though Quinn was allowed to be extremely offensive about me). Given (quite improperly) only a minute to look at his report, I was
struggling to ask structured questions. It was fact that I had asked for those
words to be recorded at Newton Lodge. It is fact that veterinary students are
of higher calibre than medical students, have longer training, & such being the case, the end result is better. Having
had close working relationships with vets for 60 years, & having lectured to vets & students, I am well able to recognise ability or lack of it. That experience
enables me to recognise ability or lack of it in doctors. Lucky to have had good
health during my long life, I have had minimal contact with them previously, but have always had the greatest respect for
the profession – until coming to this evil place.
Page 22:
A; Having only had time to skim through Quinn’s report, Judge Goldsack stopped me from developing questions that would bring the truth out of him.
B; ‘Today is not the time to have a running argument’? SURELY, courts are supposed to find out the truth, & an essential part of it is to
have each of the parties challenging the other, each putting forward their ‘argument’. Judge Goldsack listened intently to all Quinn’s lies,
but stopped me from proving them to be lies.
Page 23:
C; Judge Goldsack should have said, ‘I have to sentence you because you have been convicted of an extremely serious offence of violence’.
D: ‘inaudible’ should be ‘Timothy John
Evans, Mahmood Marchant, Stefan Kisko, Robert Brown & others were all ‘convicted’ – though completely
innocent. Some were hung. Again,
Judge Goldsack should have said ‘on the basis that you have been found guilty’.
F/G;
‘forged documents’ should be ‘COURT documents’.
A MOST MISLEADING ERROR.
Page 24:
D; ‘acute scratches’,
should be ‘needed
a few stitches in the back of his hand - when he & a mob handed gang had
smashed into my then home’.
Page 25:
G; Earlier, he had said there were only two options, back to ‘hospital’ – or prison. Not until this very late stage did he mention bail - giving me no time to present grounds for bail - & he had obviously not received
them from the Appeal Court.
Page 26:
B; ‘How the nation have we paid’, should be ‘How
the nation has repaid
the much greater debt
it undoubtedly owes to me is another matter’.
C; ‘the British will not even notice if they come’, should be ‘When Fascism (or
worse) comes to Britain, the British will not even notice. It DIDcome,
& they did not notice’. ‘it’s
rising in Nazi Germany’ should
be ‘AS in Nazi Germany, all too many are happy to be part of it’. ‘many
notes distorted to the truth’ should
be ‘many gross distortions
of the truth were fed to the jury’.
Page 27: B; ‘(inaudible) the Lord Chancellor
spoke to the Commons’ should be ‘I have
a letter from Geoffrey Hoon MP, then the Lord Chancellor’s spokesman in the Commons telling how my Strasbourg case was to be incorporated into the 1998 Human Rights
Act’.
F-G; ‘who are now doctors’ should be ‘Doctor Shipman
& lesser miscreants in the medical profession’.
Page 28:
A; ‘TO 8thAugust
‘99’, should be ‘FROM 8th August ’99).
This is a most important error!
B;
‘a new law (inaudible)’ should be ‘a new law,
specially invented by Rose LJ for me’.
C; ‘not for my own thing’ should be ‘not
for my own sake - but for this nation’. E; ‘There is evidence outside , which I will read to you as I’m (inaudible)’. This is a meaningless version of what I said.
It should be ‘There is evidence outside which will prove my innocence, or at least
strong grounds for mitigation. It is not available to me while incarcerated’.
Page 29:
A; ‘One (psychiatrist) being Dr. Quinn’. This is monstrous.
I had never met or heard of Dr. Quinn till I arrived at Newton Lodge – AFTER the Appeal Court hearing. Whether
this nonsense came from the Appeal Court I know not.
F;
‘I was anxious to have as up-to-date information as I could from Dr. Quinn’. There you have it!
Judge Goldsack is anxious to have as many lies as possible from murderous quack doctor Quinn – but is desperate
to avoid hearing the truth from me. Being a ‘LIP’ I am not a human
being - only an object to be discussed & played with by those who, having university degrees, believe themselves to be
Gods, on a different plane to those who have not.
Page 31:
G; ‘the danger that the trial judge determined he posed’. The ‘danger’ that I present is not to the public, but to
those like Bentley - because of the massive
amount of evidence I have of their corruption! Which is why he banned the press from my ‘trial’, then sentenced me to die in prison
– for a first ‘offence’! It is he who is the danger to the public – not me!
Page
33: B; I did not say ‘Did I have a part …? What
I said was ‘I DID
have a part in the shaping of the Human Rights Act’. G;
Why was this said to Mr. Hatton after
I had left the court????? He will
simply repeat the same monstrous lies that were fed to the jury - & will CERTAINLY tell Judge Goldsack nothing in my favour. My grounds for appeal against sentence, & grounds for bail pending sentence
- & the 60 years of testimonials - will be of infinitely greater help to the judge than anything from the prosecution.
Enclosed are Reports from Dr. Barrington Barber
& Lesley Shackleton, in direct contradiction of drug crazy, drugging pushing Dr. Quinn.
See also my document ‘Nazi Hospitals’, & ‘Shipman2’.
I am quite serious in saying that Quinn is worse
than Dr Harold Shipman. ‘Impossible’ it will be said. Just as was said about Shipman himself.
The facts in this Witness Statement are true
(E & OE)
Norman
Scarth 31st March 2003
