Now doc. Ref. ChC-Disclose030903
Page 1 of 2 .
From NORMAN SCARTH (born 1925), Founder Member of THE ARTICLE 6 GROUP.
Now POLITICAL PRISONER GV5409,
Currently at HM PRISON WOLDS GULAG, BROUGH, E.YORKSHIRE HU15
2JZ
3rd Sept. 2003
In the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Leeds District
Registry.
re. Norman Scarth v Graham Moore (ex Chief Constable of West
Yorkshire). case LS 190 197
A Claim for £1,000,000 (plus punitive & exemplary damages)
for potentially lethal assaults by W.Y.Police on 8th August 1999 & 20th July 2000, false imprisonment, perjury & other
misconduct.
This document is my
'Request for Disclosure' of information & documents, by the solicitor for West Yorkshire Police,
and by The Leeds
District Registry of the High Court & Leeds County Courts themselves. They
are included in the one document to make it more comprehensive, & hopefully give better understanding of the general picture,
especially to those who read it after my death, which cannot be too far away.
Today is the anniversary of the outbreak of World War II during which many gave their lives to prevent
the imposition of a Police State. Tragically, they died in vain. Britain is a Police State, comparable to Hitler's Germany or Stalinist Russia, though here
it is well hidden, & the victims fewer - as yet!
In this case there is collusion (tacit or otherwise) between police, courts & the Prison
Service to deny me access to documents, records & evidence. In making these
requests for disclosure I am forced to rely on memory.
To: A.K.HUSSEIN,
WEST YORKSHIRE POLICE SOLICITOR. Police HQ, Laburnum Road, Wakefield WF1 3QP.
Tel: 01924 292 187,
Fax: 292 196 F.O.A.
Mr. Michael S. Percival.
Your letter of 15 August 2003, & 'DEFENCE' document received.
1.) Were I not inured to such feelings, I would be shocked at the bare faced effrontery &
shamelessness of the DEFENCE document, which ADMITS that horrific crime was committed against me by W.Y.
Police & others, but says, "... no reasonable grounds for bringing this claim & ought to be struck out", - & "...
the Claimant has suffered no recoverable loss or damage...".
2). It indicates that you are supremely confident that the judiciary will confirm that our
police are as untouchable & unaccountable as were Hitler's 'Gestapo'. I AM
surprised that you miss out the usual parrot phrase from lawyers when facing a Litigant In Person, "This action is frivolous,
vexatious & an abuse of process of law".
3). I ask for 'Disclosure' of information &
documents as below, & trust you will not cause more deliberate delay than has occurred already, by
forcing me to seek an Order for disclosure.
(a). Please disclose: The F.W.I.N. number, & information held about me on the Forces Wide Intelligence Network (&
other police records) since I was a Parliamentary Candidate in 1997, particularly that immediately
prior to the terror attack & siege of 8th AUGUST 1999, the 11 months following (during which I suffered
unlawful but effective 'house arrest', imprisoned by justifiable fear), &
currently. Also any changes, with the dates.
(b). The names of the 6 officers who were with
Acting Inspector McGee early in the siege, & the 2 others who came shortly before it ended.
(c). The names of the officers, one a (Ch)Inspector who made another 'surprise' visit on 15/8/99
- when a written response to my faxed letter would have been more appropriate.
(d). The reason why Kenneth Neil Roberts was not charged with giving false information to
the police, & wasting police time.
(e). Please supply copies of letters to the Chief Constable & Chapeltown Police Station
in the days, weeks & months following 8/8/99, from myself, Leeds Councillor Mrs. Amanda Carter, Mesdames E. Adshead, Diane
Mitchell, the Royal Naval Association & others, & copies of replies to
each.
(f). Copies of document (with a copy of the frontispiece of the book 'PRINCIPLED POLICING')
faxed by me to every Police Station in Leeds during that time. The name of the
Inspector from Pudsey Division who responded by telephone.
continued
page 2 of 2
(g). The names of the 2 plain clothes (Special Branch?) police from Weetwood Division who
came to 59 Gledhow Park Grove at about 6 p.m. Monday 10th(?) July 2000, & the purpose of their visit. What instructions had they received from police at the House of Commons, &/or MI5?
(h). Now to the 'INCIDENT' OF 20TH JULY
2000: At the Stansted aircraft hi-jacking in February 2000 (& similar
incidents) 'trained negotiators' were called in. Essex Police were warmly
praised by the Prime Minister, Home Secretary, Lord Lieutenant, High Sheriff et al, because their 'professionalism' had enabled
it to be ended with no harm to anyone. In that case the hi-jackers were armed
with guns & bombs, & had hostages. Why did W.Y. Police not show the same
professionalism (& humanity) - instead of brutality & thuggery - when tackling one solitary, law abiding World
War II veteran on 20th July 2000?
( i ). Why did W.Y. Police push 2 comparatively innocent bailiffs in front of them to do their
dirty work?
( j ). How many police, fire service, ambulance
& other personnel were present or on standby, & for what purpose? What
weapons were carried or available to the police on 8/8/99 & 20/7/2000?
(k). One
question is not obviously connected to the matters above, but could be more relevant than appears
at first sight: In December 1994 I was called as an 'expert witness' in Bingley
Magistrates' Court. I was able to prove that there had been very serious perjury,
& conspiracy to commit perjury by prosecution witnesses. The
victim of the malicious prosecution was acquitted. With no personal axe to grind
I was aghast at having witnessed such perjury (far worse than that of Jonathan Aitken or Jeffrey Archer),
but appeared to be alone in my concern. I pressed various authorities on the
matter, but was given the run-around for several months, eventually receiving a letter from Inspector Hennigan, Keighley Division,
saying that no action was to be taken, the acquittal of the victim of the perjury having resolved the matter. Is turning a blind eye to perjury by prosecution witnesses common with W.Y. Police?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To: The Leeds District Registry of the High Court & Leeds County Courts: 'Request for Disclosure'.
PREFACE: In the weeks & months which followed
the attack & siege of 8th AUGUST 1999, K.N.Roberts committed perjury & his solicitor John Lyndon Richards
deceived the court to obtain a Possession Order (LS 89 55 334). This was quashed
on appeal to Chancery Judge Behrens. I myself made a Claim (N.Scarth v K.N.Roberts,
case ?
), & sought an Order for the committal of K.N.Roberts & J.L.Richards for the perjury & deception of the
court. In the course of those actions copies of transcripts of tape recordings
of the attack & siege were lodged with the High Court & County Court. They
would be seen by most of the following: District Judges, Lobb, Lord & others;
The Honourable Judges Behrens, Grenfell & Robert Taylor; Court Manageress Linda Mayhew (?), Michael Ganfield & Scott
Smith.
I REQUEST COPIES OF THE TRANSCRIPTS.
Also a copy of my letter dated 20 Sept 1999 in Case number LS 89 55 334 (marked FAO HH Judge
Robert Taylor). I have part of it, but not all.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I look forward to an early reply from the solicitor for W.Y.Police, & from Leeds Combined
Court Centre. I cannot survive much longer in this evil place.
Yours, with little no hope of either Justice OR
Mercy in the courts or prisons
of Police State Britain (the land of which I was so proud
for so long).
The regimes of Hitler, Stalin, Sadaam Hussein et al would silence
ALL ‘dissidents’ & political opposition.
So does Lawyer Blair's regime.
