In The Gulag Archipelago, Alecksandr Solzhenytsin wrote: “I’m dragging it out into the light of day all
on my own. Of course there are hundreds like me who could drag it out too. Well, it didn’t fall to them, it fell to me.
And I am doing the work of a hundred men, & that’s all there is to it.”
God (or Fate, or whoever) has chosen me to do the work of ten thousand men. I suppose it is an honour – but I wish He had chosen someone else!
Since incarceration, by superhuman effort I have managed to start the actions listed below. There are far too many, but any one of them can bring horrific truth to light:
Appeals against conviction & against sentence: Crim. Appeal Ct. R v N.Scarth, Ref. 2001/2818/Y3 & 2002/00269Y3/A0
||||
Application. to Set Aside unlawful judgment of 4/4/03.
Appeal against unlawfully re-imposed sentence: 2003/02978/Y3 |||||
Bail Application 2003/02978/Y3
CCRC, R v Scarth 00582/2001, & 00414/2003 ||||
High Court (Admin Court, RCJ), The Queen v Bradford Justices (ex parte N.Scarth) CO/3653/2001, |||| & The Queen v Premier Custodial Group (ex parte N.Scarth), CO/3236/2001. ||||
High Court (Leeds D.R.), N.Scarth v Premier Custodial Group, LS 154 664. ||||
N.Scarth v Graham Moore (ex Ch. Con. of W.Yorks) LS 190 197. ||||
N.Scarth v Yorkshire Post Newspapers Ltd. LS 190 173. My £100,000 libel Claim. Judgment in my favour 5/9/01 –
but Claim struck out three months AFTER judgment !!!! Appeal
Court judge pretended judgment did not exist! My attempts to Petition the
House of Lords over this brought correspondence with their Judicial Office (from 20 Jan 03). There own documents are proof that the skullduggery goes right to the top.
Dossier re. Grenfell & Leeds Courthouse staff sent to Lord Chancellor’s Judicial Appointments Group. Div
V. re. the above. It was given a
Ref. No. C99/282/10.
LATE NOTE, 6th January 2004. I found the tel. no. &
rang: Was Judicial Appointments Group, now Judicial Correspondence Group. Tel: 020
7217 4847. Mr. H. Hochfelder confirmed they had documents from me on 12/6/01,
26/09/01 (The dossier C99/282/10) & 1/10/01. He promised to send me
copies. Copy of C/282/10 did arrive, but not the other two. I rang Mr. Hochfelfer’s number (0207 217 4805 – Fax 4875).
Mr. Michael Coyne said he would leave a note for Mr. Hochfelder.
N.Scarth
v Kenneth Neil Roberts, LS 190 350. ||||
N.Scarth
v A.Blair, LS 154 665: Petition to have Blair’s 2001 election declared
nul & void, because a candidate intending to stand against him (me), & eligible to do so (in spite of being
in prison at the time) was prevented from so doing. At the second of two
hearings Judge Wolstenholme(?) struck out the petition. The hearings were very
civilized, but completely unlawful, in gross violation of Article 6 of the ECHR. The
judge’s position, promotion or sacking depended on Lord Chancellor Irvine, & HIS position depended
entirely on Tony Blair. The case was cast iron, & I would have taken it further,
but one little old man can only do so much. George W. Bush is President by bad
arithmetic, & Blair is PM by skullduggery as great as anything in Zimbabwe.
N.Scarth
v S.Curran LS 390 259 – the Professor of psychiatry who says I’m crackers!
I don’t object to that – but he also told lies about me!
European
Court of Human Right, PP 14120/2001.
During a
break in my ‘trial’, a dossier (including the press banning notice) was sent to Lord Chancellor Irvine,
asking him to send an incognito observer. He didn’t. It was also sent to about 60 MPs, Baroness (Betty) Boothroyd, & Baroness Gould of Potternewton
(where I was reared) but ignored by all.
