From Norman Scarth, Political Prisoner GV5409, (born 1925, the oldest - & most ‘dangerous’ -
prisoner in England).
Current address, Her Majesty’s Prison, Wolds Gulag, BROUGH,
HU15 2JZ, East Yorkshire, England.
To the Parole Board, Probation Service & others.
Cc. The whole
wide world.
1) A 47 page dossier entitled ‘APPLICATION FOR RELEASE ON PAROLE’
handed to me on Wed. 14th January 2004 contains Reports from various different people. It invites me to comment on the Reports (which I do later), &
‘give any other information you feel the Parole Board should
have … to decide whether your early release on licence would put the public at risk, whether you are likely to commit
any further offences, & what the chances of you returning to society to lead a law-abiding life will be’.
2) That is grossly offensive: The only people ‘at
risk’ would be the gangsters with wigs & robes who infest the judiciary, ‘at risk’ because of the mass
of evidence I have of their skullduggery. Your orders, specific or just understood, are that you play your
part in preventing that evidence ever coming to light! Please do not insult me
by pretending otherwise.
3) Further offences? The only
blot on my lifelong record was put there by those gangsters, because I was being successful at exposing them. ‘Lead a law-abiding life’? I
have done for 78 years, working harder than any of you would know how to – harder than ever now,
when I should be enjoying a well-earned retirement!
4) Sadly there is no time for retirement or rest when such evil is abroad. It
is an honour that God should chose a little old man like me to lead the fight against it, but I am disappointed that He should
decide I must do so almost alone. Never in the past would I have claimed to be
better than anyone else – but I do so now!
5) I have given infinitely more to this nation than the whole lot of you put
together, from fighting in WW2, to bringing a vital change in British law 53 years later, (incorporated into the
1998 Human Rights Act). Yet you have been given
the power to decide whether I live or die, & where. I have no wish
to die in prison, but will be proud to do so if you decide that must be my fate. My
blood will be on your hands, my death on your consciences – or it would be if you had consciences!
6) Standing
for Parliament in 1997 as an Independent Old Age Pensioner, the two main points in my manifesto (& in my book ‘CAUSE
FOR CONCERN’ were my concern at the LACK of concern by regular politicians at the horrifying
increase in two types of crime:
. (a) Violent
& murderous attacks on the vulnerable & the old (a national disgrace, unheard of at one time), and
(b)‘Fraud In The Legal
System’ (of which I had newly become aware). Rampant & rife
in the courts, it flourishes unchecked & unreported!!.
Footnote
My mission was to reduce the number
of each. Worthy objectives, surely? – but the second one earned me very powerful enemies!
I had put down my last £500 as
the election deposit, knowing I would lose it.
Would any of you do as much in the fight against crime?
7) Two years later I was to be the victim of both
crimes – by this ruthless, merciless & lawless Police State, OF WHICH YOU ARE PART!
8) Two Probation Officers I would trust (see paras. 41/42). The three most recent ones I would trust as much as Adolf Eichman (the Nazi hung
for being a ‘desk murderer’). They have a depraved appetite for
lies (copography), but a phobic aversion to the truth. Footnote
Peter Lowden’s only
meeting with me was during a surprise visit in Armley Gaol. Cut short by brutal
guards, he had nothing on which to base his Report, so just copied the monstrous lies & gross distortions of the truth
fed to the (specially selected) jury by Judge Bentley. He condemned me
for saying “If I had killed him it would not have been a crime”. I
was trying to state what IS the law of the land, forced to use the plainest words
because of the gross misconduct of Bentley. The few present
at that grotesque ‘trial’ will tell you there was never one like it since the days of Judge Jeffries.
9) Much of British law is based on precedent, & I was trying
to quote a binding precedent (see para. 32, & my document ‘InFear’).
With hate in his eyes, Bentley pounced on me, “You will NOT quote other cases, but deal
with this one only!” Such blatant contempt for the law is beyond belief.
10) The dead eyes of these Probation Officers only lit up when they uttered the favourite stock
question, “Do you feel remorse for your crime”, as did the eyes of Parole Board member P. Palmer when he asked
the same. At his only visit on 16/01/04 (another surprise),
he expressed disappointment that I did not accept his proffered handshake, telling him I would do so if he proved he had a
conscience and courage.
11) That favourite stock question from people like you has resulted in many innocent people
spending many years in prison after they could have been released on parole, because they would not compromise
their integrity by expressing ‘remorse’ for a crime they did not
commit. A notable one was Robert Brown who spent 25 years in prison before his
innocence was proved, corrupt police being responsible for his conviction. Do
you not feel shame? Would that you had Robert Brown’s integrity!
12) I THROW THE QUESTION BACK AT YOU:
Do YOU feel remorse for crime against me a million times worse? (see para. 6). It started eleven months before
the offence of which I stand convicted.
13) On Sunday afternoon, 8th August 1999, I was alone at home, a completely
law abiding old age pensioner, doing no wrong to anyone. I was subjected
to a potentially lethal terror attack by a gang of untouchable, unaccountable British Gestapo - without
even the pretence of a lawful excuse. This was followed
by eleven months of unlawful but effective ‘house arrest’, imprisoned by fear of further attack.
14) It came on 20th July 2000, when I received a brutal kicking which put me in hospital
on intravenous antibiotics. Then followed a malicious prosecution, with perjury
in sworn affidavits, & at my grotesque ‘trial’. My witnesses,
my evidence & the press were banned by Judge David Ronald Bentley. That should
have set alarm bells ringing. After the savage sentence of ten years –
on a WW2 veteran (a War Hero said Tony Benn) - for a first ‘offence’, the alarm bells were enough
to waken the dead, but ALL our lawyer controlled ‘watchdogs’ were (& are!) determined
to be deaf & blind.
15) The nationwide cover-up of the police crime has been total.
Conviction was followed by physical brutality & unremitting (still continuing) mental torture, in a succession
of British Belsens. The public are constantly told by politicians & the media
that our prisons are ‘Holiday Camps’. You are insiders & know
they are not! Why do you not speak up, as Sir David Ramsbotham has done in his
new book, ‘PRISONGATE’? This sadistic pretence that you may give
me parole is itself cat & mouse torture.
16) I work through the night (as now), still foolishly searching for just one person
with power who has NOT sold his/her soul to The Devil. Prison
Wing Officers do have a spark of humanity. They ALL say
that a man like me should not be in prison at all, but admit that they fear for their own futures if they dare to speak up. Who can blame them, when they see what happens to one who does? But, it did not end happily for the German people when they turned a blind eye to the excesses of the Nazis. There was a heavy price to pay. There
will be again.
29) The two most dangerous madmen in the world are Bush & Blair, yet they are free to destroy
what is left of civilization with their own ‘weapons of mass destruction’.
When they maim & murder innocent men, women & children they call it ‘Collateral Damage’. The little boy with his arms blown off is one example.
30) The very minor ‘collateral damage’ suffered by the bailiff
who smashed into my home was because he was stupid enough to allow himself to be pushed forward to do the dirty work of the
real villains, the private army of Gestapo police. After
the Stansted aircraft hi-jacking (& similar situations) much pride was shown by the police, & much praise heaped
upon them, because the incidents had been resolved with no harm to anyone, thanks to the ‘professionalism’ of
the police. Why didn’t my attackers use the same ‘professionalism’?
31) I use the word ‘Gestapo’. Until
the attack of 8/8/99 I still trusted the British Bobby, in spite of the far too many scandals,
& have gone to their assistance more than once. Late in life I learned the
truth.
32) Those who deliberately shot & killed Harry Stanley & James Ashley (two innocent
& defenceless men) are completely free, still armed, without a stain on their characters (see my document ‘InFear’.
33) I have killed nobody, attacked nobody, yet I am suffering incredible physical brutality
& unrelenting mental torture until I die in prison - because I stood for Parliament & wrote a book in 1997, brought
a momentous change in British law in 1998/99 (single-handed!) via the European Court of Human Rights, & intended
to stand against Lawyer Blair at the 2001 General Election.
34) Those who ignore the blindingly obvious, & persist in saying otherwise are motivated
by their own malice, or fearful of the consequences if they fail to deliver what is expected of them by the Blair regime –
just as in Hitler’s Germany or Stalinist Russia.
35) I could of course grovel before you, say all the things you are programmed to accept (much
good it would do me), but Democracy, Truth, Justice, & the Rule of Law are much more important than my fate. In 1943 I was prepared to give my life to defend them, lucky to survive when my brave
young shipmates did give theirs.
36) They died in vain, that which we were fighting against then is here now. I am again prepared to give my life in the hope that it may help to restore those
precious things to Britain. A foolish hope, so powerful, so numerous are the
corrupt, so brainwashed or spineless the rest of the nation. My apologies to
the few who are not.
37) Having had 60 years longer than my shipmates, my sacrifice will be small compared to theirs. Anyway, what decent person would want to live in this ‘1984’
Police State? Sadly, there are millions who enjoy being part of it, just as in
Hitler’s Germany, all but a tiny handful too brainwashed/apathetic/cowardly to speak up.
‘Look after number one’ is the National Motto.
38) Her Majesty’s Government, Opposition (??), Prison Service, Probation Service, Parole
Board et al purport to act in the name of the Queen, & thus are bound by the Sovereign’s Oath,
sworn before Almighty God, “TO DELIVER JUSTICE WITH MERCY”.
39) Mahatma Gandhi & the Suffragettes fasted when imprisoned. Imperial Britain could be brutal, but still had enough respect for that oath to release them when they
were close to death. For the Suffragettes, the government of the day quickly
passed the 1912(?) ‘Prisoners (Temporary Release from Custody) Act’.
Known as the ‘Cat & Mouse Act’, it was used to drag them back to prison as they gained strength.
40) Whatever about Justice, those who are part of Lawyer Blair’s regime have as much mercy
for me, a caged & defenceless old man, as was shown by Myra Hindley & Ian Brady to Lesley Downey, a trapped &
defenceless little girl. There were only two of them. It is taking tens of thousands to destroy me &, with licence to commit any crime, they are close to
complete success.
41) The two decent Probation Officers? One was
the blond woman in Leeds who helped me to obtain bail pending trial. The other
was Simon Welsh of Sheffield, who wrote a Pre Sentence Report dated 30/5/01. Though
he stated he could not produce a full report because of lack of information, he being from Sheffield, me from Leeds, he did
ask one question which screamed out loud for an answer! “…
WHY HE APPEARS TO HAVE BREACHED A LIFELONG ADHERENCE TO A LAW-ABIDING LIFESTYLE IN SUCH SPECTACULAR FASHION”. Why indeed? Judge Bentley & the shysters
who infest the judiciary were, & are, determined the truth of that will never come out – because
it would bring disgrace not only to the police, but to their own profession!
42) Mr. Walsh also said, “I would be concerned that at his age the alien environment
of a long period of incarceration would be detrimental to him, both physically & mental”. Without doubt, Judge Bentley did take notice of those words, & gloated as he gave
a sentence which he hoped would destroy me physically & mentally!
“They whom the Gods wish to destroy, the first drive mad”, said Euripides (480-406 BC). That is a crime worse than murder, a punishment worse
than the gallows.
43) Exactly the same depravity was shown by Judge Goldsack two years later. Psychiatrist Dr. Patrick J.G.Quinn told him from the witness box at Sheffield Crown Court, “Sending
him back to prison (from a secure hospital) could have catastrophic consequence on his mental health”. Hoping for those ‘catastrophic consequences’, Goldsack DID
send me back to prison, confident that the Prison Service would do its best to drive me to mental breakdown, and/or to take
my own life, as they do to many other victims.
44) No death penalty in Britain? We may not have
the gallows, but we do have more fiendish ways, when it is called ‘suicide’ or ‘self
harm’. Though the brutality inflicted on me brings concern from only a
tiny few, perhaps my death may waken the rest of the nation, & the people of ‘Perfidious Albion’ will prove
the title (bestowed by Bishop Jacque Benigne Bassnet 300 years ago) to be unjustified. Perhaps not.
45) Perfidious? Treacherous? Corrupt? Cowardly? Dishonest?
Depraved? It is hard to find words to describe Britain today. Proud to
be British for 70 years, all my lifelong beliefs have been shattered. It is with
the utmost shame that I am forced to say that Mohammed Ali was closest to the truth when he said “The white man is The
Devil”. None more devilish than Peter Lowden.
46) I paraphrase Martin Luther King, “I fear not the words & actions of the wicked,
but I DO fear the silence of the (supposedly) honest”. Those
who see the devil’s disciples at work, but remain silent & turn their backs, are far from honest!
47) LATE NEWS: 20/01/04.
I have today been handed a document dated 20/1/04 responding to my application for transfer to a Category D (Open)
prison. It shows that the supposed considering of my Application
for Parole is a total sham. It says:
“RE-CATEGORISATION APPLICATION. NOTIFICATION
OF DECISION. Following your recent application for re-categorization from Category
C to Category D the Board (it doesn’t say which ‘Board’) has made the following decision: Your application for re-categorization has not been successful.”
Reasons: “No offence focused work has been
undertaken” (none has been OFFERED to me!), “therefore there is no tangible evidence of a
reduction in risk”.
(Risk? - at the age of 78, with only one very doubtful blot on my lifelong record?)
“There
is evidence that you appear to minimize the offence for which you were convicted”.
(The offence WAS minimal - compared to the killings of Harry Stanley & James Ashley, the little
boy who had his arms blown off - for neither of which has there been a prosecution; - the killing of a young man who was singing
in the street outside his own door, & the man who had an axe sticking in his skull. (see para. 23)
“There
is no real evidence of constructive participation in sentence planning”. “There
has been NO sentence planning – in spite of my written requests!”
“There appear to be some issues with re-settlement”
(what are they, I am aware of none?) “& a clear risk for potential breach of trust exists”. (Do they think I would go on the run with a Zimmer frame?)
“Taking
all these factors into consideration a move to Category D conditions is not appropriate at this time”.
(‘At
this time’? I’m 78 now. Will they say the same when I’m 90?)
This decision by a faceless & nameless ‘Board’,
was signed by ‘D.Smith’ who I have never ever met. There was no indication
of his position or rank.
48) I am eligible for parole in April, & the
Parole Board are supposedly considering it. Yet, according
to this ‘Board’, (who will be submitting their views to the Parole Board), with only three
months to go, I am not even deemed fit to be in a Category D prison! Why
do they play such sadistic games?
ADDENDUM:
49) Page N2 of the Parole Dossier tells one version
about my prison ‘offence’ (punished by 3 days loss of association): ‘in the library he was rude &
loud to Education staff, & refused to leave’. The truth: Lesley Shackleton, Head of Education at Dovegate Prison was asked by the Appeal Court to provide a written
Report on me. In it she said, “He works quietly… & is always respectful to prisoners & staff alike.”
Library staff at Wolds will say the same, as will all prisoners.
50) On the day in question I was, as always, working away quietly, but there was criminal misconduct
against me by a temporary woman officer from Education, substituting for library staff. (It
was obvious she was acting on the orders of Education Manageress Pat Wilcox). It
is not only my right to complain, but my duty to do so, which I did, respectfully, but then Education staff came in mob-handed,
compounding the crime, adding sneers & insults. I returned to my work &
continued quietly, though badly shaken by the vicious verbal assault, till it was time to return to my cell on the Wing. I set off to do so, but as a special treat for my 78th birthday,
I was brutally dragged to the punishment block. Whatever the excuse, there was
no justification for such treatment (se page one for my Election Manifesto).
51) Many complain of, & fight against ‘the system’. I do not: Better a bad system, run by good people, than a
good system, run by bad people. We have a bad system, run by very
bad people. It is they I try to expose.
This document tells only a tiny part of the horror. It WILL
get worse!
4,336 words.
The facts in this WITNESS STATEMENT are true to the
best if my knowledge, belief & recollection, E&OE.
Signed:
Norman Scarth (aka Winston Smith), 22nd January 2004 (‘1984’+ 20)